Archive | March, 2013
Image

Smile

14 Mar

20130314-202305.jpg

Your business may depend on it!

Advertisements

mHealth

14 Mar

I’m fascinated by all of the novel uses of smart phones these days. The field of mHealth-mobile phones used for diagnostics is particularly attractive, lucrative and growing. I envision a day where the phone can perform all the tests you need to go see a doctor for. Our generation will demand it and engineers will make it possible, because capitalists will see the payout.

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/13/the-benefits-of-mobile-health-on-hold/

In an interesting excerpt from the times article linked above;

Aydogan Ozcan, who runs an electrical engineering lab at U.C.L.A., has developed small attachments to cellphones that can serve as a sophisticated microscope, diagnose common diseases, detect pathogens such as E. coli and sniff out allergens.  The phone can also send reports to a Google Map server to plot the spread of disease (it’s only meaningful, of course, if enough people use the system).   Perhaps most intriguing, his lab has developed an online game in which players undergo a brief training, then examine slides of cells to guess if they are infected with malaria.  Dr. Ozcan found that a group of nonexperts came within 1.25 percent of the accuracy of an expert, opening the possibility that a crowd of amateurs could perform remote diagnoses when experts are scarce.

Crowdsourcing diagnostics…wow!

I take issue with the authors claim that, “Success should mean better health outcomes.” I’m not against better health outcomes, I just feel their is a convenience aspect to the devices. The outcome’s might be the same if you had gone to a doctor, but the mobile device saved you a trip. This line of reasoning may be more applicable to rich countries than developing ones, where people don’t have access to a doctor. In which case I would hope the applications provide better health outcomes.

Your Brain Is Hooked on Being Right

1 Mar

“That’s partly due to another neurochemical process. When you argue and win, your brain floods with different hormones: adrenaline and dopamine, which makes you feel good, dominant, even invincible. It’s a the feeling any of us would want to replicate. So the next time we’re in a tense situation, we fight again. We get addicted to being right.

I’ve coached dozens of incredibly successful leaders who suffer from this addiction. They are extremely good at fighting for their point of view (which is indeed often right) yet they are completely unaware of the dampening impact that behavior has on the people around them. If one person is getting high off his or her dominance, others are being drummed into submission, experiencing the fight, flight, freeze or appease response I described before, which diminishes their collaborative impulses.”

 

http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2013/02/break_your_addiction_to_being.html